GUIDELINES AND CHECKLIST FOR CONSTRUCTIVIST (a.k.a. FOURTH GENERATION) EVALUATION

نویسندگان

  • Egon G. Guba
  • Yvonna S. Lincoln
چکیده

Evaluation is one of the three basic forms of disciplined inquiry, the others being research and policy analysis. It is that form of inquiry whose focus is some evaluand (program, process, organization, person, etc.) and which results in “merit” and/or “worth” constructions (judgments) about it. Merit constructions converge on the intrinsic quality of an evaluand, irrespective of the setting in which it may find applications. Worth constructions converge on the extrinsic usefulness or applicability of an evaluand in a concrete local setting. Evaluation of a proposed or developing evaluand is termed “formative,” while evaluation of some developed evaluand is termed “summative.”

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The RIMES Statement: A Checklist to Assess the Quality of Studies Evaluating Risk Minimization Programs for Medicinal Products

INTRODUCTION Pharmaceutical risk minimization programs involve interventions designed to support safe and appropriate use of medicines. Currently, information regarding the evaluation of these programs is not publicly reported in a standardized and transparent manner. To address this gap, we developed and piloted a quality reporting checklist entitled the Reporting recommendations Intended for ...

متن کامل

Improving the Quality of Diagnostic Studies Evaluating Point of Care Tests for Acute HIV Infections: Problems and Recommendations

The diagnosis of acute human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (AHI) plays a unique role in preventing the spread of HIV and ending the epidemic. Acutely infected individuals are thought to contribute substantially to forward transmissions of HIV; however, diagnosing AHI in resource-limited settings has proven to be a challenge. While fourth generation antigen-antibody combination assays h...

متن کامل

The AGREE Reporting Checklist: a tool to improve reporting of clinical practice guidelines

The international Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE) research team developed a tool to assess the methodological quality of practice guidelines— the original was released in 2003 (AGREE),1 and the revised and updated version in 2009 (AGREE II).2 AGREE II has become a widely used standard for evaluating the methodological quality and transparency of practice guidelines inte...

متن کامل

Postpublication external review of the Japanese guidelines for the management of stroke 2004.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Many guidelines for management of stroke have been published throughout the world, but no postpublication external review of any set of stroke guidelines by users, using standard checklists, has been reported. The purpose of this article is to present the results of an external review of the Japanese Guidelines for the Management of Stroke 2004, conducted several months p...

متن کامل

An Evaluation of Quality Checklist Proposals - A participant-observer case study

Background: A recent set of guidelines for software engineering systematic literature reviews (SLRs) includes a list of quality criteria obtained from the literature. The guidelines suggest that the list can be used to construct a tailored set of questions to evaluate the quality of primary studies. Aim: This paper aims to evaluate whether the list of quality criteria help researchers construct...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2002